“…I probably won’t go down in history, but I will go
down on your sister…”
Hank Moody, Californication
Professor
Moriarty Here, your one and only source into the scandalous lives of magic’s
elite. Who am I? That’s a secret I’ll never tell…
Ok, enough
with the Gossip Girl Jokes and let us get down to business:
Oh how I miss
the taste of a sweeter life my lovely readers for I cannot stand being
geographically and intellectually surrounded by magicians who are
constantly trying to find the easy way out when it comes to designing the
internal logic of an effect.
As an initial
clarification for the present article and its topic I would like to quote Mike Vincent when he said that there was
no such thing as a self working effect.
Let us think
about it for a second: If you have a folding half dollar and a bottle right in
front of you, they will stay there unless
you pick them up, the effect will not happen without the intervention of
the performer, who, incidentally, has to be familiar with the elements in question
and the proper way of handling them if he desires to present the effect in a
decent manner.
The fact that the internal logic of the effect is somewhat automatic
does not mean its performance will.
In the long
lost blog “Double Facers”, Sleight of hand god Tony Chang wrote a lot about the invalidity of difficulty as a
parameter when creating magic. In other words, you should not care about difficulty
when working on a desired effect’s internal logic for the only thing that
matters is its final strength and impact when ultimately one chooses to perform
it live.
Automaticity,
in conclusion, must not be a predisposition but a consequence. If the strongest
outcome demands we practice the longitudinal swivel steal for 10.000 hours, we
shall take it. On the other hand, if the effect benefits the most from a method
that happens to be self-working, we must take it as well.
However, I’ll
be the first to come out of the move monkey closet and admit that I love
difficult sleight of hand and the in depth study of the different
methodological paths one may take when creating an effect and I found myself
totally reflected on the introductory words Derek
Delgaudio wrote in “Only Notes”
when speaking about his “Newton’s center
deal”:
“…False deals are a wonderful barometer in assessing one’s proficiency and
dedication to card technique. This is not to say that if one does not false
deal, one is not proficient. Simply, perfection in any false deal takes a
certain dedication. If someone claims they are a “Card Man”, the quality of his
false deals can tell you a lot. I like that”
I certainly
hope Derek does not get upset with me
for quoting him but whatever the result may be, if it gets him to read this it
will accomplish the primary motive of the author, as he needs the attention.
I should
mention that the idea for the present article came to mind after I saw a Facebook picture advertising a lecture
containing only self working effects by whom I consider to be one of the most
intelligent magicians in the area. Although I have nothing against him in
particular, the example may serve us well in explaining those more realistic
variables that come in to play when one creates and shares magic.
The truth is
I am writing this article with an amateur’s point of view, which I am extremely
proud of but if one works magic for a living some other things may be more
important when selecting and creating an effect. These things present
themselves as variables such as the time it takes to re set the effect, the
time it takes to perform it, pocket management and so many other things.
When it comes
to a lecture, two variables that are not so pretty in pink stand the out like a
sore thumb:
A lecture
must be commercial; it must have variety both in effect and difficulty.
Magicians like to press a button and see something happen, if they do not walk
out of a lecture with something that they can go home with and perform for their
Persian cat then it does not get the money.
Most
magicians, sadly, are not very skillful when it comes to sleight of hand and
they hide themselves behind the poorly constructed idea of hobbyists when in
reality they do not want to embrace their despicable laziness.
I’d ask you
to pardon my French, but that is the way it goes…
An example of
what has been discussed herein will be provided in the following delivery of
the much acclaimed “Crème de la crème”
series
David Gilmour’s
acoustic rendition of "Wish You Were Here" now accompanies me as I type the final
words of this fantastic article/essay.
XOXO lovely readers, Professor Moriarty now checks
out…
“...I
think if I'm 40 and I don't have any kids and I'm not married, I would have a
baby artificially inseminated. I would feel like Mary - like Jesus is my baby…”
Kim Kardashian
Kim Kardashian